Sanders v. Ray et al
Michael Donald Lee Sanders |
Darrin Ray and Duckworth & Ray |
4:2022cv00619 |
February 22, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Gray H Miller |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 ORDER denying #9 Motion to Appoint counsel.(Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(rguerrero, 4) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Appointment of counsel by Michael Donald Lee Sanders, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/2/2022. (rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 7 ORDER granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (Signed by Judge Gray H Miller) Parties notified.(olindor, 4) |
Filing 8 Letter from Michael Sanders re: Status of case, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 5 NOTICE of Change of Address by Michael Donald Lee Sanders, filed. (rkonieczny, 4) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Michael Donald Lee Sanders, filed. (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Michael Donald Lee Sanders, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/15/2022. (bgoolsby, 4) |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Michael Donald Lee Sanders.(bgoolsby, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.