Nunley v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Richard Lee Nunley |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| 4:2022cv00625 |
| February 18, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Christina A Bryan |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Social Security: DIWC/DIWW |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
RETURN of Service Executed as to United States Attorney General on 3/17/2022 re: Summons and Complaint, filed.(jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
RETURN of Service Executed as to Office of the Regional Chief Counsel, Region VI Social Security Administration on 3/8/2022 re: Summons and Complaint, filed.(jdav, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERKS NOTICE OF CANCELLATION Initial Conference set for 6/15/2022 is CANCELED. Parties notified, filed. (MelissaMorgan, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Commissioner of Social Security served on 3/8/2022, answer due 5/9/2022, filed. (SpencerSavarese, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 08/16/2022. Joinder of Parties due by 07/15/2022. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 02/14/2023. Deft Expert Report due by 03/16/2023. Discovery due by 05/02/2023. Mediation due by 07/18/2023. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 06/01/2023. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 06/01/2023. Joint Pretrial Order due by 08/17/2023. Docket Call set for 09/19/2023 at 9:30 AM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (josephwells) (Entered: 03/16/2022)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/15/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 701 before Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
|
Summons Issued as to US Attorney General, Office of the Chief Regional Counsel, and SDTX AUSA. 3 Summons, 3 USM 285 forms, and Complaint delivered to USM Office in person., filed.(olindor, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis granted on 02/18/2022 by Judge Lynn N. Hughes) filed by Richard Lee Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons, #3 Summons, #4 Summons) (ltien, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Nunley v. Commissioner of Social Security | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Richard Lee Nunley | |
| Represented By: | Melissa Ann Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
