Garner et al v. City of Houston Police Department et al
| Sheryl Garner, My Companies and Darron Garner |
| City of Houston Police Department and City of Houston Mayor Office |
| 4:2022cv00633 |
| February 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry Pre-motion conference hearing held before Judge Andrew M Edison on April 18, 2022. Plaintiff to file amended complaint by 4/29/2022. Defendants may file motion to dismiss by 5/13/2022 without the need to file a further request for a pre-motion conference. Plaintiff to respond to motion to dismiss by 6/3/2022. Defendants may file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss by 6/10/2022. Appearances:Sheryl Garner, Pro Se Plaintiff. Melissa Azadeh, for Defendants. (Digital # 2:00 - 2:11)(ERO:Yes), filed.(agould, 3) |
| ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 4/13/2021 re: 10 Document(s) Sent, filed. (dhansen, 4) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Setting re: #6 REQUEST for pre-motion conference. Parties notified. Pre-Motion Conference set for 4/18/2022 at 02:00 PM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison, filed. (rcastro, 4) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Referral of Motion to Magistrate Judge Andrew Edison re: #6 REQUEST for pre-motion conference, filed. (bthomas, 4) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by City of Houston Mayor Office, City of Houston Police Department, filed.(Azadeh, Melissa) |
| Filing 6 REQUEST for pre-motion conference, filed.(Azadeh, Melissa) |
| Filing 5 Additional Case Information (Related to Complaint #1 ) by Sheryl Garner, filed.(thanniable, 4) Modified on 3/29/2022 (thanniable, 4). |
| Filing 4 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to City of Houston Mayor Office served on 3/16/2022, answer due 4/6/2022, filed.(thanniable, 4) |
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
| Summons Issued as to City of Houston Mayor Office, City of Houston Police Department. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(ckrus, 4) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/22/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 600 in Houston before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RachelWillborg, 4)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Sheryl Garner, Darron Garner, My Companies.(SamanthaWarda, 4) |
| Confirmation of receipt of payment in the amount of $ 402 Receipt date: 2/25/2022. Receipt number hou107444. Purpose Description: Civil Filing Fee. (SamanthaWarda, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
