Kronospan, LLC v. Finland Shipping Inc. et al
Kronospan, LLC |
Finland Shipping Inc., Dalex Shipping Co. S.A. and Spanaco Shipping Services Limited |
4:2022cv00653 |
March 2, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Contract: Marine |
46 U.S.C. ยง 1300 Carriage of Goods by Sea Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Stay pending arbitration.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(arrivera, 4) |
Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION to Stay Pending Arbitration by Kronospan, LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Oliver, Robert) |
Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Kronospan, LLC, filed.(Oliver, Robert) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/13/2022 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(RachelWillborg, 4) |
Filing 2 First AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Kronospan, LLC. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Kronospan, LLC.(Oliver, Robert) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27820552) filed by Kronospan, LLC.(Oliver, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.