Malik v. GM Stores, LLC et al
| Asif M Malik |
| GM Stores, LLC, Tanveer Moosa and GM Stores, LLC doing business as GM Chevron |
| 4:2022cv00655 |
| March 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for FLSA.(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 5/25/2022 at 02:40 PM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(RachelWillborg, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to GM Stores, LLC, Tanveer Moosa. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Asif M Malik, filed.(Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(Scalise, Charles) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27823032) filed by Asif M Malik. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Scalise, Charles) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
