Aburajouh v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
| Bilal Aburajouh |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE |
| 4:2022cv00672 |
| March 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2674 Federal Tort Claims Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, filed.(Hinrichs, Fred)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (BrandisIsom, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons, #3 Summons)(Ferguson, Timothy)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 5/25/2022 at 02:50 PM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(ShannonHolden, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27829551) filed by Bilal Aburajouh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Ferguson, Timothy)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
