Pipkin v. Bennett Motor Express LLC et al
Deborah (Lauman) Pipkin and Deborah Lauman Pipkin |
Bennett Motor Express LLC, Theodore Gaze and Ruel Smith |
4:2022cv00685 |
March 4, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Sim Lake |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Sex Discrimination |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with jury demand by Bennett Motor Express LLC, filed.(Blomquist, Peter) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Bennett Motor Express LLC, Theodore Gaze, Ruel Smith. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/17/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Deborah (Lauman) Pipkin, filed.(Smith, John) |
Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Deborah (Lauman) Pipkin, filed.(Smith, John) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Deborah (Lauman) Pipkin, filed.(Smith, John) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Deborah (Lauman) Pipkin (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27834519) filed by Deborah (Lauman) Pipkin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Right to Sue)(Smith, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.