Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC v. Carrasquero
Plaintiff: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC, and Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC
Defendant: Marco Carrasquero
Case Number: 4:2022cv01114
Filed: April 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alfred H Bennett
Nature of Suit: Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 11, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 8/11/2022. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(kpicota, 4)
July 29, 2022 Filing 9 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Marco Carrasquero by Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice)(Coleman, Jesse)
July 15, 2022 Filing 8 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 11/4/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett, filed. (ledwards, 4)
July 14, 2022 Filing 7 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to reschedule the initial pretrial and scheduling conference to, September 12, 2022 and to allow the parties to file a joint discovery/case management plan 10 days before by Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/4/2022. (Coleman, Jesse)
June 28, 2022 Filing 6 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Marco Carrasquero served on 6/28/2022, answer due 8/29/2022, filed.(Coleman, Jesse)
April 8, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Marco Carrasquero. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
April 7, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/29/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4)
April 7, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Marco Carrasquero, filed.(Coleman, Jesse)
April 7, 2022 Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC, identifying Baker Hughes International Branches LLC as Corporate Parent, filed.(Coleman, Jesse)
April 6, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Marco Carrasquero (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-27992205) filed by Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC,. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Coleman, Jesse)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC v. Carrasquero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC,
Represented By: Jesse Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Baker Hughes Oilfield Operations LLC
Represented By: Jesse Coleman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Marco Carrasquero
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?