Lurks v. Title Max, Inc. et al
| Marlena Lurks |
| Title Max, Inc. and MVTrac, LLC a/k/a MVConnect, LLC |
| 4:2022cv01176 |
| April 12, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/7/2022 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 700 before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(DMcKinnieRichardson, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to MVTrac, LLC a/k/a MVConnect, LLC, Title Max, Inc., U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (BrandisIsom, 4) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Marlena Lurks, filed.(Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to MVTrac, LLC a/k/a MVConnect, LLC, Title Max, Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons - MVTrac, LLC)(Zelman, Yitzchak) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against MVTrac, LLC a/k/a MVConnect, LLC, Title Max, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28018053) filed by Marlena Lurks. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zelman, Yitzchak) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
