Singh v. Mayorkas et al
| Jasjeet Singh |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Tae D. Johnson, Matt Baker, Merrick B. Garland and Warden Tate |
| 4:2022cv01243 |
| April 19, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Habeas Corpus - Alien Detainee |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 ANSWER to #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus by Matt Baker, Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson, Alejandro Mayorkas, Warden Tate, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Proposed Order Granting Motion to Dismiss)(Perry, Catina) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Order to Show Cause as to in Support of Petition by Jasjeet Singh, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/1/2022. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 4
ORDER TO ANSWER (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(ShoshanaArnow, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Letter/Notice of Non-Consent to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Jasjeet Singh, filed.(ledwards, 4) Modified on 5/2/2022 (ledwards, 4). |
| Filing fee: $5.00 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number HOU108513, filed. (GloriaVasquez, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (jdav, 4) |
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by Jasjeet Singh.(jdav, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
