Naranjo et al v. Scottford Custom Home Designers and Consultants LLC et al
Manuel Furlos Naranjo and Carlos Eduardo Guevara Fuentes |
SCOTTFORD CUSTOM HOME DESIGNERS AND CONSULTANTS LLC, Brian Scott and Michelle L Bassett |
4:2022cv01255 |
April 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lynn N Hughes |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 7/5/2022 at 03:00 PM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons, #2 Summons) (RachelWillborg, 4) |
Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Supplement, #2 Supplement)(Dore, James) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Carlos Eduardo Guevara Fuentes, Manuel Furlos Naranjo, filed.(Dore, James) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by James Dore on behalf of Carlos Eduardo Guevara Fuentes, Manuel Furlos Naranjo, filed. (Dore, James) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28055668) filed by Manuel Furlos Naranjo, Carlos Eduardo Guevara Fuentes. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Dore, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.