Schwartz v. Utilikon LLC et al
Plaintiff: Spenser Schwartz
Defendant: Utilikon LLC and Chagnon Dean Earley
Case Number: 4:2022cv01319
Filed: April 25, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lynn N Hughes
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 10, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Order Resetting Conference terminating #12 . Initial Conference reset for 7/28/2022 at 10:30 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
June 10, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION for Continuance of Initial Pretrial Conference by Spenser Schwartz, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/1/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Buenker, Josef)
June 6, 2022 Filing 11 Clerks ENTRY OF DEFAULT against Utilikon LLC. Parties notified. (ghassan, 4)
June 6, 2022 Filing 10 Amended PROPOSED ORDER for entry of clerk's default re: #8 Request for Entry of Default, filed.(Buenker, Josef)
June 6, 2022 Filing 9 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Chagnon Dean Earley, filed. (ClaudiaGutierrez, 4)
June 6, 2022 Filing 8 REQUEST for Entry of Default against All Defendants by Spenser Schwartz, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Buenker, Josef)
May 9, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Utilikon LLC served on 5/4/2021, answer due 5/25/2021, filed.(Buenker, Josef)
May 9, 2022 Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Chagnon Dean Earley served on 5/4/2022, answer due 5/25/2022, filed.(Buenker, Josef)
May 2, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Chagnon Dean Earley, Utilikon LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (BrandisIsom, 4)
April 29, 2022 Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(Buenker, Josef)
April 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 7/11/2022 at 11:00 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4)
April 25, 2022 Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Spenser Schwartz, filed.(Buenker, Josef)
April 25, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28075703) filed by Spenser Schwartz. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Buenker, Josef)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schwartz v. Utilikon LLC et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Spenser Schwartz
Represented By: Josef Franz Buenker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Utilikon LLC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chagnon Dean Earley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?