Martin v. Wilkenfield et al
George Wesley Martin |
Cecila Wilkenfield, Penny Lynn Hammack, Julian C. Dirst and Tacy A. Gilbert |
4:2022cv01329 |
April 25, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Civil Rights: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Letter from George W. Martin re: state court transcripts, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE of Filing Fee Due. Parties notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
![]() |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by George Wesley Martin. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.