Barnet v. University of Texas Medical Branch - Correctional Managed Healthcare et al
| Clayton Landon Barnet |
| University of Texas Medical Branch - Correctional Managed Healthcare, TDCJ Health Services Division, Sylvia Lynette Linthicum, Dr. Jose Fernandez and Dr. Frances E. McGinnis |
| 4:2022cv01403 |
| May 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. The Court ORDERS that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All pending motions, if any, are denied as moot. Case terminated on 6/30/2022. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Clayton Landon Barnet. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 6/3/2022, filed. (bgoolsby, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Clayton Landon Barnet, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/23/2022. (DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Clayton Landon Barnet.(DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
