Iraheta v. Central Loan Administration and Reporting et al
| Jose D Iraheta |
| Central Loan Administration and Reporting doing business as Cenlar FSB, Citibank NA, American Security Insurance Company, John Doe, Transunion LLC, Equifax Information Services LLC, Andrews Federal Credit Union and JOHN DOE(1-10) |
| 4:2022cv01411 |
| May 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Christina A Bryan |
| Sim Lake |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Transunion LLC served on 6/30/2022, answer due 7/21/2022, filed.(Iraheta, Jose) |
| Filing 12 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to American Security Insurance Company served on 6/30/2022, answer due 7/21/2022, filed.(Iraheta, Jose) |
| Filing 11 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Equifax Information Services LLC served on 6/30/2022, answer due 7/21/2022, filed.(Iraheta, Jose) |
| Filing 10 Second AMENDED COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Jose D Iraheta. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Jose D Iraheta.(Iraheta, Jose) |
| Filing 9 Summons Issued as to American Security Insurance Company, Andrews Federal Credit Union, Central Loan Administration and Reporting, Citibank NA, Equifax Information Services LLC, Transunion LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 8 Request for Issuance of Summons as to American Security Insurance Company, Andrews Federal Credit Union, Central Loan Administration and Reporting, Citibank NA, Equifax Information Services LLC, Transunion LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 SUMMONS REQUEST - CITI, #2 SUMMONS REQUEST - SAIC, #3 SUMMONS REQUEST - AFCU, #4 SUMMONS REQUEST - EQUIFAX, #5 SUMMONS REQUEST - TRANSUNION)(Iraheta, Jose) |
| Filing 7 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with JURY DEMAND against All Defendants filed by Jose D Iraheta. Related document: #1 Complaint, filed by Jose D Iraheta.(Iraheta, Jose) |
Filing 6
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Court's Approval to Electronically file case documents via CM/ECF. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan) Parties notified.(MelissaMorgan, 4)
|
| Filing 5 ADVISORY to the Court by Jose D Iraheta advising the plaintiff does not consent to have a United States Magistrate Judge preside over a trial by Jury and final judgment., filed.(jdav, 4) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER - CASE REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan.. Parties to advise court w/in 20 days if they will consent to Judge Bryan. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Court's Approval to Electronically file case documents via CM/ECF System by Jose D Iraheta, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/24/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(thanniable, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against American Security Insurance Company, Andrews Federal Credit Union, Central Loan Administration and Reporting, Citibank NA, John Doe, Equifax Information Services LLC, Transunion LLC filed by Jose D Iraheta.(thanniable, 4) (Additional attachment(s) added on 5/3/2022: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (thanniable, 4). |
| Initial Filing fee: $402.00 re: #1 Complaint,, receipt number HOU108789, filed. (thanniable, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
