Tilley v. Canal Barge Company, Inc.
Plaintiff: L. M. Tilley
Defendant: Canal Barge Company, Inc.
Case Number: 4:2022cv01451
Filed: May 5, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alfred H Bennett
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 American Disabilities Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Gillian Griffin to Appear Pro Hac Vice.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(rkonieczny, 4)
June 9, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Related Case by Canal Barge Company, Inc., filed. (Bowdler, Bryan)
June 8, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION for Gillian Griffin to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Canal Barge Company, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 6/29/2022. (Bowdler, Bryan)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER granting #8 MOTION for Bryan Edward Bowdler to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(olindor, 4)
June 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER granting #9 MOTION for S. Mark Klyza to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(olindor, 4)
June 6, 2022 Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Canal Barge Company, Inc., filed.(Klyza, S)
June 1, 2022 Filing 9 MOTION for S. Mark Klyza to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Canal Barge Company, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 6/22/2022. (Klyza, S)
June 1, 2022 Filing 8 MOTION for Bryan Edward Bowdler to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Canal Barge Company, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 6/22/2022. (Bowdler, Bryan)
May 26, 2022 Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Canal Barge Company, Inc. served on 5/16/2022, answer due 6/6/2022, filed.(O'Brien, Kerry)
May 26, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by L. M. Tilley, filed.(O'Brien, Kerry)
May 19, 2022 Filing 5 ADVISORY by L. M. Tilley, filed.(O'Brien, Kerry)
May 6, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/2/2022 at 09:00 AM in Courtroom 8C before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4)
May 6, 2022 Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Canal Barge Company, Inc. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4)
May 5, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Canal Barge Company, Inc., filed.(O'Brien, Kerry)
May 5, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Canal Barge Company, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28134424) filed by L. M. Tilley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(O'Brien, Kerry)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tilley v. Canal Barge Company, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: L. M. Tilley
Represented By: Kerry V. O'Brien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Canal Barge Company, Inc.
Represented By: S Mark Klyza
Represented By: Bryan Edward Bowdler
Represented By: Gillian Griffin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?