Chavez v. Home Depot USA , Inc.
| Ruthann Chavez |
| Home Depot USA, Inc. |
| 4:2022cv01700 |
| May 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
SCHEDULING ORDER. Pltf Expert Report due by 10/3/2022. Deft Expert Report due by 11/4/2022. Discovery due by 1/20/2023. Mediation due by 12/23/2022. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 1/30/2023. Joint Pretrial Order due by 3/31/2023. Docket Call set for 4/7/2023 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 11B before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal(Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
|
Filing 9
Minute entry for proceedings before the Hon. Lee H. Rosenthal. Initial conference held on June 30, 2022. The court will separately enter a scheduling and docket control order, as stated in detail on the record. Appearances: Stephen Boutros for Pltf. and Kathleen Banks for Deft.(Court Reporter: L. Smith), filed.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 8
PROPOSED ORDER Scheduling and Docket Control Order, filed.(Banks, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing 7
JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Home Depot USA, Inc., filed.(Banks, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing 6
First INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Ruthann Chavez, filed.(Boutros, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 5
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Ruthann Chavez, filed.(Boutros, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 4
RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Home Depot USA, Inc. served on 4/26/2022, answer due 5/17/2022, filed.(Boutros, Stephen)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 6/30/2022 at 09:40 AM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. A Zoom link will be provided. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Supplement) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Home Depot USA, Inc., filed.(Banks, Kathleen)
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 240th Fort Bend County District Court, case number 22-DCV-292745 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28227438) filed by Home Depot USA, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Index of Matters Being Filed, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C, #5 Exhibit D, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Bernhardt, Jason)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Chavez v. Home Depot USA , Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Ruthann Chavez | |
| Represented By: | Stephen George Boutros |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Home Depot USA, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Kathleen Marie Bell Banks |
| Represented By: | Jason R Bernhardt |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
