Pines v. ASI Lloyds et al
Plaintiff: Edi Pines
Defendant: ASI Lloyds and Lesley Newsom
Case Number: 4:2022cv01841
Filed: June 6, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Ewing Werlein
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 15, 2022 Filing 7 ANSWER to Amended Complaint with Jury Demand by ASI Lloyds, Lesley Newsom, filed.(Schexnyder, LaDonna) Modified on 7/15/2022 (thanniable, 4).
June 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER Granting #5 Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave to File First Amended Complaint. Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint which was included as Exhibit "A" to Plaintiff's Motion for Leave (Doc. No. #5 ) is deemed filed. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified. (marflores, 4)
June 23, 2022 Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Leave to File Amended Complaint by Edi Pines, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/14/2022. (Attachments: #1 Complaint, #2 Proposed Order)(Woellner, Andrew)
June 23, 2022 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Edi Pines, filed.(Woellner, Andrew)
June 13, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) and/or 12(b)(7) by ASI Lloyds, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/5/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Proposed Order)(Schexnyder, LaDonna)
June 8, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/16/2022 at 03:30 PM in Room 11521 before Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr. (Signed by Judge Ewing Werlein, Jr) Parties notified.(AkeitaMichael, 4)
June 6, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 189th JDC of Harris County, TX, case number 2022-27708 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28278303) filed by Lesley Newsom, ASI Lloyds. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Index of Matters Being Filed, #3 Exhibit A - Certified State Court Record, #4 Exhibit B - Declaration Page of Policy, #5 Exhibit C - Correspondence Accepting Agent Liability, #6 List of Parties and Counsel of Record, #7 Certificate of Interested Parties, #8 State Court Notice of Removal)(Schexnyder, LaDonna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Pines v. ASI Lloyds et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edi Pines
Represented By: Andrew A Woellner
Represented By: Tabatha Raven Fuentes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ASI Lloyds
Represented By: LaDonna Grey Schexnyder
Represented By: Carin Leigh Marcussen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lesley Newsom
Represented By: LaDonna Grey Schexnyder
Represented By: Carin Leigh Marcussen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?