Johnson v. Rosenthal et al
| R. Wayne Johnson |
| Judge Lee Rosenthal, Judge Lynn N Hughes, Judge Ryan Patrick and Laurretta Bahry |
| 4:2022cv01859 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER denying #5 Motion for Recusal..(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Recusal by R. Wayne Johnson, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/6/2022. (SpencerSavarese, 4) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER OF DISMISSAL denying as moot #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. This civil action is dismissed with prejudice. A certificate of appealability will not be issued. Case terminated on June 8, 2022 (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by R. Wayne Johnson, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/27/2022. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Laurretta Bahry, Lynn N Hughes, Ryan Patrick, Lee Rosenthal (Filing fee $ 402) filed by R. Wayne Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(ShannonHolden, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
