Valero v. Collier et al
| Andrew M. Valero |
| Brian Collier, C.F. Hazelwood, Moises Villalobos, Jr., Dana C. Sullivan, Rowdy D. Daigle, Timothy Hunter, Claranee L. Houston and Kyla E. Rosario |
| 4:2022cv02272 |
| July 8, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 25, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Letter from Andrew Moses Valero, filed. (mmarquez, 5) |
Filing 6
ORDER OF STATUS TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
| Filing 5 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Andrew M. Valero, filed.(dhansen, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Andrew M. Valero, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Andrew M. Valero, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/29/2022. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Andrew M. Valero. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (RachelWillborg, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
