Collins v. Midland Mortgage
Kimberly Collins |
Midland Mortgage, a Division of MidFirst Bank and Midland Mortgage |
4:2022cv02414 |
July 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Kenneth M Hoyt |
Real Property: Foreclosure |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 31, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 MOTION to Dismiss and Brief in Support, by Midland Mortgage, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/2/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Frame, Nicholas) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 11/17/2022 at 09:00 AM before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Midland Mortgage, a Division of MidFirst Bank, filed.(Frame, Nicholas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 334th Judicial District of Harris County, Texas, case number 202238804 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28494019) filed by Midland Mortgage, a Division of MidFirst Bank. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.