Jennings et al v. J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC et al
| Debra Jennings, The Law Office of Debra Jennings, P.L.L.C., Lanease Fuller and The Law Office of Lanease Fuller |
| J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC, Chase Insurance Agency, Inc. and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. |
| 4:2022cv02459 |
| July 25, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Voluntary Motion to Dismiss. Case terminated on September 14, 2022.(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to Dismiss NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS JP MORGAN SECURITIES, LLC, CHASE INSURANCE AGENCY, INC, AND JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) (1)(A)(i) by Lanease Fuller, Debra Jennings, The Law Office of Debra Jennings, P.L.L.C., The Law Office of Lanease Fuller, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/3/2022. (Attachments: #1 Order Voluntary Motion to Dismiss)(Lewis, U.A.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand by Lanease Fuller, Debra Jennings, The Law Office of Debra Jennings, P.L.L.C., The Law Office of Lanease Fuller, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/30/2022. (Lewis, U.A.) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #7 CHASE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTENDTIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFFS' ORIGINAL PETITION. The deadline for Chase to answer or move in response to Plaintiffs Amended Petition is extended to August 22, 2022..(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Original Petition by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 9/9/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Proposed Order)(Simmons, Jeremy) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE re: #6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Original Petition, #7 Unopposed MOTION Proposed Order Granting Chase Motion to Extend Time by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. (Simmons, Jeremy) |
| Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION Proposed Order Granting Chase Motion to Extend Time by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 9/8/2022. (Simmons, Jeremy) |
| Filing 6 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Original Petition by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 9/2/2022. (Simmons, Jeremy) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Reassignment. Case reassigned to Judge Andrew S Hanen. Judge Charles Eskridge no longer assigned to the case. Parties notified, filed. (JosephWells, 4) |
|
Filing 4
RECUSAL ORDER. Judge Charles Eskridge recused. All deadlines in scheduling orders remain in effect, and all court settings are vacated.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Reassignment. Case reassigned to Judge Charles Eskridge. Judge Sim Lake no longer assigned to the case. Parties notified, filed. (sanderson, 4) |
|
Filing 2
RECUSAL ORDER. Judge Sim Lake recused. Deadlines in scheduling orders subsist. Court settings are vacated.(Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 189th District Court of Harris County, case number 2022-42556 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28512814) filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Simmons, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
