Walker v. Texas Department of Corrections et al
Drayl Eugene Walker and Daryl Eugene Walker |
Texas Department of Corrections, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Connally Unit, Ramsey Unit and Hugh Unit |
4:2022cv02522 |
July 28, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 FINAL JUDGMENT (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4) |
Filing 5 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER dismissing as moot #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Case terminated on 08/01/2022. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4) |
Filing 4 DOCKETED IN ERROR. NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4) Modified on 7/28/2022 (AkeitaMichael, 4). |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Drayl Eugene Walker, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/18/2022. (AkeitaMichael, 4) Modified on 7/28/2022 (AkeitaMichael, 4). |
Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Drayl Eugene Walker.(AkeitaMichael, 4) (Main Document 1 replaced on 7/28/2022) (bgoolsby, 4). |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.