Antaki v. Accenture, LLP
| John Antaki |
| Life Insurance Company of North America and Accenture, LLP |
| 4:2022cv02541 |
| July 29, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A. |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 21, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint. (Answer due 10/20/2022 for Accenture, LLP). (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Rachel Kaercher to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 10 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint by Accenture, LLP, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint)(Herring, Danielle) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Rachel P. Kaercher to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Accenture, LLP, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/11/2022. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Herring, Danielle) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Accenture, LLP filed by John Antaki.(Valdez, Selina) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER granting #6 MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint; (Answer due 9/22/2022 for Life Insurance Company of North America). (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 6 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendant to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Original Complaint by Life Insurance Company of North America, filed. Motion Docket Date 9/21/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Granting Joint Motion for Extension)(Herring, Danielle) |
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/16/2022 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RachelWillborg, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Life Insurance Company of North America. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by John Antaki, filed.(Valdez, Selina) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Life Insurance Company of North America, filed.(Valdez, Selina) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Life Insurance Company of North America (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28545374) filed by John Antaki. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Valdez, Selina) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
