Patra v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation et al
| Gyanendra K Patra |
| Schlumberger Technology Corporation and Christopher L Tritico |
| 4:2022cv02722 |
| August 11, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #7 Motion to Dismiss and to Strike. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the motion to dismiss is granted, and the plaintiffs claims against STC for (1) age discrimination (2) religious discrimination, (3) disability discrimination, (4) personal injury (5) retaliatory hostile work environment, (6) quid pro quo sexual harassment/retaliation for non-tangible and non-adverse employment actions, (7) race/national origin discrimination, and (8) defamation are hereby DISMISSED. Case terminated on May 18, 2023.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
|
| Filing 17 PROPOSED ORDER re: #16 Additional Proofs and Evidences to Supplement the Original Filings List of Exhibits, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 16 Additional Proofs and Evidences to Supplement the Original Filings List of Exhibits by Gyanendra K Patra, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit, #6 Exhibit)(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 15 MOTION for Attorney Fees by Christopher L Tritico, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit Affidavit of Christopher Tritico, #2 Exhibit Exhibit A - Legal Fees of Christopher Tritico, #3 Exhibit Exhibit B - Legal Fees of James Krell, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order for Attorney Fees)(Tritico, Christopher) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER OF DISMISSAL granting #6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). It is further ORDERED that Tritico Rainey PLLC and/or Christopher L. Tritico, request for the award of attorney fees is hereby Granted as plaintiff's claims are frivolous, meritless and/or groundless. Tritico Rainey PLLC and/or Christopher L. Tritico are to file a claim for attorneys fees on or before March 15, 2023. The plaintiff shall respond on or before April 1, 2023. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
|
|
Filing 13
ORDER FOLLOWING TELEPHONE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on January 30, 2023 at 8:45 a.m. Appearances: Waived. Telephonic appearances are waived. Initial Disclosures due by 3/3/2023. Pltf Expert Witness List due by 7/1/2023. Pltf Expert Report due by 7/1/2023. Deft Expert Witness List due by 8/1/2023. Deft Expert Report due by 8/1/2023. Discovery due by 9/30/2023. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 10/15/2023. Docket Call set for 1/8/2024 at 11:30 AM in Courtroom 11A before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt. Discovery may be extended by agreement of the parties without Court intervention. The dispositive motion deadline and docket call dates, however, may not be extended without leave of Court. Attorney's fee applications are handled on the papers of the parties after notice. Expedited responses are required on all pretrial motions save dispositive motions. ETT: 2-3 days. Jury trial. (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
|
| Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Schlumberger Technology Corporation identifying Schlumberger Limited as Corporate Parent, filed.(Landin, Alexander) |
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Christopher L Tritico, filed.(Tritico, Christopher) |
| Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed.(Landin, Alexander) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Alexander C. Landin to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION for Alexander C. Landin to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/9/2023. (HeatherCarr, 4) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss , MOTION to Strike ( Motion Docket Date 1/3/2023.) by Schlumberger Technology Corporation, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Proposed Order)(Roberts, MaryJo) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) by Christopher L Tritico, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/25/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order Order to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6))(Tritico, Christopher) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Gyanendra K Patra, filed.(JosephWells, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (jdav, 4) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 1/30/2023 at 08:45 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Christopher L Tritico. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Schlumberger Technology Corporation, Christopher L Tritico filed by Gyanendra K Patra. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(jdav, 4) |
| Filing Filing fee: $402.00 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU110668, filed. (jdav, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
