Krempasky v. ConocoPhillips Company
Plaintiff: Greg Krempasky
Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company
Case Number: 4:2022cv02800
Filed: August 18, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Labor: Fair Standards
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2022 Filing 14 NOTICE of Related or Similar Action by Greg Krempasky, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1 - Complaint)(Montgomery, Taylor)
October 10, 2022 Filing 13 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by ConocoPhillips Company, filed.(Clark, Shauna)
October 7, 2022 Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by ConocoPhillips Company, filed.(Clark, Shauna)
September 30, 2022 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by ConocoPhillips Company, filed.(Clark, Shauna)
September 19, 2022 Filing 10 STIPULATION re: Defendant ConocoPhillips Company's Responsive Pleading Deadline for Plaintiffs' Original Complaint by ConocoPhillips Company, filed.(Clark, Shauna)
September 9, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Greg Krempasky, filed.(Montgomery, Taylor)
September 2, 2022 Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to ConocoPhillips Company served on 8/26/2022, answer due 9/16/2022, filed.(Montgomery, Taylor)
August 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/18/2022 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 703 before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ealexander, 4)
August 24, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER OF RECUSAL. Judge Charles Eskridge recused. Case reassigned to Judge David Hittner for all further proceedings.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
August 19, 2022 Filing 5 Summons Issued as to ConocoPhillips Company. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4)
August 18, 2022 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Dunlap on behalf of Greg Krempasky, filed. (Dunlap, Andrew)
August 18, 2022 Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Taylor S. Montgomery on behalf of Greg Krempasky, filed. (Montgomery, Taylor)
August 18, 2022 Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to ConocoPhillips Company, filed.(Josephson, Michael)
August 18, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against ConocoPhillips Company (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28638538) filed by Greg Krempasky. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Consent, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Josephson, Michael)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Krempasky v. ConocoPhillips Company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Greg Krempasky
Represented By: Andrew Wells Dunlap
Represented By: Taylor Shelton Montgomery
Represented By: Michael A Josephson
Represented By: Richard J Burch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ConocoPhillips Company
Represented By: Shauna Johnson Clark
Represented By: Andrew Allen Yeh
Represented By: Kimberly Frances Cheeseman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?