Powell v. Heimbuck et al
| Christopher Powell |
| Christopher Heimbuck, Anny Andrade, Adrian Amonett and Olabintan Abimbola |
| 4:2022cv03024 |
| September 2, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER. Plaintiff is ORDERED to pay the $402.00 filing fee, or submit a properly-supported non-prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis, within THIRTY DAYS from date of this order. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Christopher Powell re: #2 Notice to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening, filed. The address was updated and the Order/Notice was re-noticed. (DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Christopher Powell, filed. (DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Change of Address by Christopher Powell, filed. (DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Christopher Powell. (Attachments: #1 Grievance form)(DMcKinnieRichardson, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
