Morales v. Cimarron Energy, Inc.
David Morales |
Cimarron Energy, Inc. |
4:2022cv03219 |
September 20, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
Labor: Fair Standards |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by David Morales, filed.(Burch, Richard) |
Filing 12 ORDER granting #8 Motion for Armando A. Ortiz to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Cimarron Energy, Inc., filed.(Jackson, Marcia) |
Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Cimarron Energy, Inc., filed.(Jackson, Marcia) |
Filing 9 CONSENT to Join a Collective/Class Action for Jeff Currie by David Morales, filed.(Ortiz, Armando) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Armando A. Ortiz to Appear Pro Hac Vice by David Morales, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/18/2022. (Ortiz, Armando) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by David Morales, filed.(Burch, Richard) |
Filing 6 SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 02/03/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 01/04/2023. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 08/02/2023. Deft Expert Report due by 09/01/2023. Discovery due by 10/17/2023. Mediation due by 01/03/2024. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 11/16/2023. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 11/16/2023. Joint Pretrial Order due by 02/02/2024. Docket Call set for 03/19/2024 at 1:30 PM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (josephwells) (Entered: 09/29/2022) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/30/2022 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Charles Eskridge(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4) |
Filing 4 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Cimarron Energy, Inc. served on 9/22/2022, answer due 11/21/2022, filed.(Burch, Richard) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Cimarron Energy, Inc. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Cimarron Energy, Inc., filed.(Burch, Richard) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Cimarron Energy, Inc. (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28804602) filed by David Morales. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Burch, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Morales v. Cimarron Energy, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: David Morales | |
Represented By: | Richard J Burch |
Represented By: | Armando A. Ortiz |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Cimarron Energy, Inc. | |
Represented By: | Marcia Nelson Jackson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.