Smith v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc et al
Plaintiff: James E Smith
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc, Richmond Montrose CVS, L.P. and CVS Pharmacy, Inc doing business as Roundrock 79 CVS LLC
Case Number: 4:2022cv03769
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: P.I.: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 16, 2022 Filing 8 Joint PROPOSED ORDER Docket Control Order, filed.(McKinney-Manning, Dagnee)
December 14, 2022 Filing 7 Agreed JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by James E Smith, filed.(McKinney-Manning, Dagnee)
November 30, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE IN A REMOVED ACTION by CVS Pharmacy, Inc, filed.(Faubion, John)
November 30, 2022 Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by James E Smith, filed.(McKinney-Manning, Dagnee)
November 14, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 1/6/2023 at 11:30 AM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. A Zoom link will be provided. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Supplement) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
November 7, 2022 Filing 3 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by CVS Pharmacy, Inc, filed.(Faubion, John)
October 31, 2022 Filing 2 Civil Cover Sheet by CVS Pharmacy, Inc, filed.(Faubion, John)
October 31, 2022 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris County District Court, case number 2022-56014 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-28997703) filed by CVS Pharmacy, Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index of State Court Filings, #2 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit Plaintiff's First Amended Petition, #4 Exhibit Citation of Service on CVS Pharmacy, Inc., #5 Exhibit Citation of Service on Richmond Montrose CVS, LP, #6 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #7 Exhibit List of Parties and Counsel)(Faubion, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Smith v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James E Smith
Represented By: Dagnee Bavier McKinney
Represented By: Dagnee McKinney-Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc
Represented By: John Christopher Faubion
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Richmond Montrose CVS, L.P.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CVS Pharmacy, Inc doing business as Roundrock 79 CVS LLC
Represented By: John Christopher Faubion
Represented By: John A Scully
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?