Jafri v. Schofer et al
| Syeda Umm e Farwah Jafri |
| Andrew Schofer and Antony Blinken |
| 4:2022cv03771 |
| October 31, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 23, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Defendants' response by Antony Blinken, Andrew Schofer, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order granting extension)(Perry, Catina) |
| Filing 4 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Antony Blinken served on 11/8/2022, answer due 1/9/2023; Andrew Schofer served on 11/8/2022, answer due 1/9/2023, filed.(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing fee: $402.00 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number HOU112173, filed. (dbarrett, 4) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Antony Blinken, Andrew Schofer, U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas and U.S. Attorney General, Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(jdav, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Goldstein, Joshua) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Syeda Umm e Farwah Jafri. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Goldstein, Joshua) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
