Le et al v. Mayorkas et al
| Ngoc Thi My Le, Hong Trinh, Minh Quan Trinh, Minh Hieu Trinh, Tuan Dac Ho, Minh Nhat Ho, Linh Khanh Nhat Ho, Bao Nhat Ho, Thuy Thi Lam Bich Le, Thi Xuan Lan Le, Hung Van, Xuan Hai Le, Ngoc Que Chi Nguyen, Tat Chien Van, Minh Thang Van and Ngoc Que Thanh Van |
| Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland, UR M. JADDOU, Kristine R. Crandall and Alissa Emmel |
| 4:2022cv03802 |
| November 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Errata re: #8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Answer by Kristine R. Crandall, Alissa Emmel, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, filed. (Robinson-Gaither, Eleanor) |
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Continuance; Motion-related deadline set re: #9 Unopposed MOTION for Continuance of Scheduling Conference. Initial Conference set for 1/20/2023 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Alfred H Bennett.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(ledwards, 4)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Continuance of Scheduling Conference by Kristine R. Crandall, Alissa Emmel, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robinson-Gaither, Eleanor) |
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Answer by Kristine R. Crandall, Alissa Emmel, Merrick Garland, Ur M. Jaddou, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/19/2022. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robinson-Gaither, Eleanor) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Merrick Garland served on 11/17/2022, answer due 1/17/2023, filed.(Cao, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
| Filing 5 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Alejandro Mayorkas, #2 Summons for Alissa Emmel, #3 Summons for Civil Process Clerk U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Texas, #4 Summons for Kristine Crandall, #5 Summons for Merrick Garland, #6 Summons for Ur Mendoza Jaddou)(Cao, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Setting. Parties notified. Motion Hearing set for 12/2/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Alfred H Bennett, filed. (ledwards, 4) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Alejandro Mayorkas, #2 Summons for Alissa Emmel, #3 Summons for Kristine Crandall, #4 Summons for Merrick Garland, #5 Summons for Ur Mendoza Jaddou)(Cao, Michael) |
| Filing 1 PETITION/COMPLAINT for Writ of Mandamus (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29006590.) filed by Hong Trinh, Thuy Thi Lam Bich Le, Ngoc Que Chi Nguyen, Thi Xuan Lan Le, Tat Chien Van, Minh Nhat Ho, Ngoc Thi My Le, Ngoc Que Thanh Van, Tuan Dac Ho, Bao Nhat Ho, Linh Khanh Nhat Ho, Xuan Hai Le, Minh Quan Trinh, Minh Thang Van, Minh Hieu Trinh, Hung Van. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Table of Exhibits and Exhibits A-J)(Cao, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
