Newman et al v. Courtesy Plumbing Services, LLC et al
CHRISTOPHER NEWMAN and JUAN PUENTE |
COURTESY PLUMBING SERVICES, LLC doing business as COURTESY REPIPES doing business as REPIPE PROFESSIONALS doing business as REPIPE PROS and PHILIP SEALS |
4:2022cv03808 |
November 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Labor: Fair Standards |
29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 9, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Christopher Newman, Juan Puente, filed.(Siurek, Mark) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/17/2023 at 04:15 PM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to COURTESY PLUMBING SERVICES, LLC, PHILIP SEALS. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons) (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix summons)(Siurek, Mark) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29008616) filed by CHRISTOPHER NEWMAN, JUAN PUENTE. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Siurek, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.