Silvas v. Stg Dept et al
| Julian G Silvas |
| Stg Dept, Sgrt Shelly, Major Rodriguez, Officer Serono and Sergeant Shelly |
| 4:2022cv03871 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER - Denying #4 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. If the plaintiff wishes to proceed, he must pay the fullamount of the filing fee for a civil action ($402.00) or submit aproperly supported motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis,including a certified inmate trust fund account statement, withinthirty days of the date of this Order. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Julian G Silvas, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/30/2022. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Julian G Silvas. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 12/12/2022, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (bgoolsby, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Julian G Silvas. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Continuation, #4 Exhibit, #5 Envelope)(BrendaLacy, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
