Card v. Whisk Crpes Caf
Gage Card |
Whisk Crpes Caf and Whisk Crepes Cafe |
4:2022cv03934 |
November 10, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Sim Lake |
Labor: Fair Standards |
05 U.S.C. ยง 704 Labor Litigation |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 16, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Whisk Crepes Cafe, filed.(Barber, Andrew) |
Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Whisk Crepes Cafe, filed.(Jodon, G) |
Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Whisk Crepes Cafe served on 11/30/2022, answer due 12/21/2022, filed.(Levy, Chad) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Gage Card, filed.(Levy, Chad) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Whisk Crepes Cafe. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Gage Card, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons for Issuance)(Levy, Chad) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/17/2023 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Whisk Crpes Caf (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29058222) filed by Gage Card. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Summons as to Whisk Crpes Caf)(Levy, Chad) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.