Contreras v. Wilson et al
| Adam Contreras |
| David Wilson, Melissa Wilson, Wanda Wilson & Her Husband, Zachary Wilson, Caleb Wilson, Wireless Spyware Located in My Ears, Philips Heart Microchip Located in my Heart, David Timothy Buchanan, Laura Lucinda Mendez, Roy Jakobs, Spy Gadget's Booth, Dongguan, China, Bonanza.com 3131, James Madison and Joe Biden |
| 4:2022cv04028 |
| November 16, 2022 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1335 Interpleader Action |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 3
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 2/24/2023 at 10:00 AM by video before Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Chief Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(AkeitaMichael, 4)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Summons Not Issued as to All Defendants. Unable to find addresses, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Adam Contreras. Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis granted by Judge Charles Eskridge on November 16, 2022. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
