ANDERSON v. Unum Group Corporation
| TYE ANDERSON and Tynisha Bouie |
| Unum Group Corporation |
| 4:2022cv04061 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Mail Returned Undeliverable as to Tye Anderson re: #3 Order for Initial Conference - FORM - Hoyt,, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 4/13/2023 at 08:45 AM before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(chorace)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Unum Group Corporation, filed.(Lynch, Dennis) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Justice of the Peace, Precinct 1, Place 2, Harris County, TX, case number 221200369114; (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29106672) filed by Unum Group Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Lynch, Dennis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
