Faniel v. OakBend Medical Center
Plaintiff: TAHJAE FANIEL
Defendant: OakBend Medical Center
Case Number: 4:2022cv04092
Filed: November 23, 2022
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alfred H Bennett
Referring Judge: Keith P Ellison
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Right to Privacy Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Copy of ORDER TO CONSOLIDATE CASES: Lead Case No. 22-cv-3740 and Member Case No. 22-cv-4092 & 22-cv-4386 (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(gclair, 4)
January 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Defendant's Answer due by 2/8/2023.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(JacquelineMata, 4)
January 6, 2023 Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by OakBend Medical Center, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/27/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Jackson, John)
January 4, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Tahjae Faniel, filed.(Gudmundson, Brian)
December 29, 2022 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Tahjae Faniel, filed.(Anderson, Ryan)
December 26, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion for Brian C. Gudmundson to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
December 20, 2022 Filing 5 First MOTION for Brian C. Gudmundson to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Tahjae Faniel, filed. Motion Docket Date 1/10/2023. (Anderson, Ryan)
November 29, 2022 Filing 4 Summons Issued as to OakBend Medical Center. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4)
November 28, 2022 Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to OakBend Medical Center, filed.(Anderson, Ryan)
November 25, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/14/2023 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(HeatherCarr, 4)
November 23, 2022 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against OakBend Medical Center (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29113921) filed by TAHJAE FANIEL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Anderson, Ryan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Faniel v. OakBend Medical Center
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: TAHJAE FANIEL
Represented By: Brian C Gudmundson
Represented By: Ryan Ladd Thompson
Represented By: Ryan H Anderson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: OakBend Medical Center
Represented By: John Martin Jackson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?