Contreras v. Madison et al
| Adam Contreras |
| James Madison, Joe Biden, Donald John Trump and Gloria Espinosa |
| 4:2022cv04131 |
| November 22, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Peter Bray |
| Lynn N Hughes |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 451 Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re #1 Complaint. Objections due within 14 days of service of this order. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter Bray) Parties notified.(jmarchand, 4)
|
| Filing 6 Letter from A. Contreras, filed. (DarleneHansen, 4) |
| Filing 5 General Reference to Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified. The initial conference set for 2/27/2023 before Judge Lynn N. Hughes is cancelled. (ghassan, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER FOR CONFERENCE. Initial Conference set for 2/27/2023 at 10:00 AM in Room 11122 before Judge Lynn N Hughes (Signed by Judge Lynn N Hughes) Parties notified.(ShannonHolden, 4)
|
| Filing 2 Summons/USM 285 Not Issued as to All Defendants due to these deficiencies: Addresses not provided., filed.(ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Adam Contreras. Application to Proceed IFP Granted by Judge Eskridge on 11/22/2022. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
