Pena Rincon et al v. Unites States Department of Homeland Security et al
Sandra Ximena Pena Rincon and Juan Sebastian Rios Pena |
Unites States Department of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas, UR M. JADDOU, Wallace L Carroll and Christopher A. Wray |
4:2022cv04311 |
December 13, 2022 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Sim Lake |
Naturalization Application |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/21/2023 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed.(Galer, Diego) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29193366) filed by Sandra Ximena Pena Rincon, Juan Sebastian Rios Pena. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Mandamus Civil Cover)(Galer, Diego) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.