Tapia, et al. v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, et al.
Javier Tapia and Jennifer Welborn |
Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Corporation |
4:2023cv00042 |
January 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Sim Lake |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 REPLY in Support of #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment , filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 8)(Knox, Kristopher) |
Filing 22 RESPONSE to #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Javier Tapia, Jennifer Welborn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiffs Original Petition, #2 Exhibit Interior Facing Train Video, #3 Exhibit Exterior Facing Train Video, #4 Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Demuren, Samantha) |
Filing 21 ORDER - Plaintiffs and Defendants filed a #20 Joint Stipulation of Dismissal stipulating to the dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) as to all claims asserted against Defendant, Union Pacific Corporation, only. Accordingly, this Court accepts the stipulation and this action is hereby DISMISSED without prejudice as to all claims asserted against Defendant, Union Pacific Corporation, only. Each party will bear its own costs...*** Union Pacific Corporation terminated..*** Attorney Daniel John Gibson and Kristopher B. Knox terminated. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 20 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Javier Tapia, Jennifer Welborn, filed.(Demuren, Samantha) |
Filing 19 ORDER - Pending before the court is Union Pacific Corporation's #7 Motion to Dismiss. Because the motion relies in part on an Affidavit that is outside the Plaintiff's Original Petition, Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(d) requires that the motion be treated as a motion for summary judgment. Accordingly, the parties are advised that ten business days from the date of entry of this Order the court will consider Defendant's Motion to Dismiss as a motion for summary judgment. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 18 EXHIBITS 3 and 4 re: #17 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Union Pacific Railroad Company, submitted on Compact Disc., filed.(jdav, 4) |
Filing 17 MOTION for Summary Judgment by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7)(Knox, Kristopher) |
Filing 16 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Javier Tapia, Jennifer Welborn, filed.(Demuren, Samantha) |
Filing 15 DOCKET CONTROL ORDER: Amended Pleadings due by 4/7/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 4/7/2023. Pltf Expert Witness List/Reports due by 5/12/2023. Deft Expert Witness List/Reports due by 6/16/2023. Discovery due by 10/20/2023. Pretrial Motions/Motions in Limine due by 11/3/2023. Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/1/2023...*** Docket Call set for 12/8/2023 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 14 CLERKS NOTICE OF CANCELLATION - Initial Conference set for 2/3/2023 at 3:00 PM before Judge Sim Lake is CANCELED. Parties notified, filed. (sanderson, 4) |
Filing 13 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Javier Tapia, Jennifer Welborn, filed.(Demuren, Samantha) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Kristopher B. Knox on behalf of Union Pacific Corporation, Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed. (Knox, Kristopher) |
Filing 11 ORDER - Granting #8 Motion for Kristopher B. Knox to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing 10 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE IN A REMOVED ACTION by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed.(Gibson, Daniel) |
Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed.(Gibson, Daniel) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Kristopher B. Knox to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/8/2023. (Gibson, Daniel) |
Filing 7 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Union Pacific Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Brief In Support of Motion to Dismiss Union Pacific Corp., #2 Exhibit Ex. 1 - ISO MTD)(Gibson, Daniel) |
Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed.(Gibson, Daniel) |
Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/3/2023 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(sanderson, 4) |
Filing fee received 1/6/2023: $402.00, receipt number ATXSDC-29285442, filed. (knguyen, 4) |
Filing 4 Amended CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed.(Gibson, Daniel) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Company, filed.(Gibson, Daniel) |
Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Union Pacific Railroad Company identifying Union Pacific Corporation as Corporate Parent, filed.(Gibson, Daniel) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris County District Court, 215th Judicial District, case number 2022-80508 () filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Ex. 1 - Process, #2 Exhibit Ex. 2 - Petition, #3 Exhibit Ex. 3 - Docket, #4 Exhibit List of Counsel)(Gibson, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.