Garcia v. BUU-DUNG LLP
| Erik Garcia |
| BUU-DUNG LLP |
| 4:2023cv00310 |
| January 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 MOTION to Reset Scheduling Conference set for April 13, 2023. (The Initial Conference is reset for 6/14/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison)(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 8 MOTION to Reset Scheduling Conference set for April 13, 2023 by Erik Garcia, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit January 30, 2023 ltrs to Def., #2 Exhibit Signature card of January 30, 2023 ltr., #3 Proposed Order)(Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Unavailability by Erik Garcia, filed. (Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 4/13/2023 at 01:00 PM in by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (rcastro, 3) |
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/13/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(BrandisIsom, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to BUU-DUNG LLP. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (RachelWillborg, 4) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Erik Garcia, filed.(Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to BUU-DUNG LLP, filed.(Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against BUU-DUNG LLP (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29387846) filed by Erik Garcia. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Receipt, #2 Exhibit Selfie, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schapiro, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Garcia v. BUU-DUNG LLP | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Erik Garcia | |
| Represented By: | Douglas Steven Schapiro |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BUU-DUNG LLP | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
