Zhu v. Mayorkas et al
| Wenling Zhu |
| Alejandro Mayorkas, Merrick Garland and John Allen |
| 4:2023cv00566 |
| February 15, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on April 6, 2023 (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
| Filing 5 STIPULATION of Dismissal by Plaintiff and by Alejandro Mayorkas, filed.(Rodriguez, Jimmy) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to John Allen, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Proposed Order, #3 Proposed Order)(Chien, David) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/6/2023 at 10:20 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(HeatherCarr, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Allen, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29472930) filed by Wenling Zhu. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Chien, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
