Green v. Warden Parcker
James Daniel Green |
Warden Parcker and Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ |
4:2023cv00577 |
February 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Keith P Ellison |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing fee: $5.00 re: #1 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus, receipt number HOU114549, filed. (koradiegwu, 4) |
Filing 7 Certified Mail Receipt Returned, executed on 2/28/2023 re: 4 Document(s) Sent, receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons, filed. (RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth A. Goettert on behalf of Bobby Lumpkin, Director, TDCJ, filed. (Goettert, Elizabeth) |
Filing 5 Certified Mail Receipt Returned as to Edward Marshall, executed on 2/23/2023 - receipt attached, access restricted to court users for privacy reasons -, filed. (DarleneHansen, 4) |
***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 2/28/2023 re: 4 Document(s) Sent,, filed. (RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
![]() |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (KimberlyPicota, 4) |
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Filing fee $ 5) filed by James Daniel Green.(KimberlyPicota, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.