Heath v. Thrasher et al
| Secial Heath |
| Bob Thrasher, James Young, Brad Shepard, Mike Shepard, David Shepard, Mike Webster, David Davis, Mike Davis, Terry Howley and Tamekia Anderson |
| 4:2023cv00761 |
| March 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 FINAL JUDGMENT. Plaintiff shall take nothing on his claims. Case terminated on March 9, 2023(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4) |
Filing 12
ORDER. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous and for failure to state a claim for which relief may be granted. Plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 9) is GRANTED. All other pending motions, if any, are DENIED. This dismissal constitutes a "strike" under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(jdav, 4)
|
| Filing 11 Case transferred in from Texas Northern. Case Number 4:22-cv-01129; certified copy of transfer order, certified docket sheet, and transfer letter received |
|
Filing 10
ORDER OF TRANSFER: Case transferred to Houston Division Division of Southern District of Texas. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 3/1/2023) (sre)
|
| Filing 9 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with certificate of trust account filed by Secial Heath. (sre) |
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Brad Shepard, Bob Thrasher, James Young, David Davis, Mike Davis, Terry Howley, Tamekia Anderson filed by Secial Heath. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
|
Filing 7
SECOND ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Secial Heath must address the following deficiency: Heath had failed to update his address of record. Although Heath provided information on a form complaint, he did not state facts of what took place, when the events took place, where the events took place (such as which particular facility), which defendants were involved, and what each particular defendant did. The statute also requires a prisoner to provide to the Court both an in-forma-pauperis (IFP) application and a certificate of inmate trust account for the six months preceding the date of filing, and Plaintiff has failed to do so. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 2/6/2023) (sre)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:7. 1983 and IFP with case number theron mailed to petitioner. Mon Feb 6 14:45:28 CST 2023 (crt) |
| Filing 6 Mail returned as undeliverable. #4 Order And Notice of Deficiency,, received back from Secial Heath as Return to Sender, Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (sre) |
| Filing 5 Mail returned as undeliverable. #3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party, #2 O' Connor (FORT WORTH CASES), received back from Secial Heath as Return to Sender, Attempted Not Known, Unable to Forward. No address update from last filed document. The current document has not been re-mailed. (sre) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER AND NOTICE OF DEFICIENCY: Secial Heath must address the following deficiency: He has not completed the necessary information in the form complaint as required by the miscellaneous order of this Court. Failure to comply with this order may lead to dismissal for failure to prosecute pursuant to FRCvP 41(b). Deadline to cure the deficiency is 30 days. (Ordered by Judge Reed C. O'Connor on 12/22/2022) (Attachments: #1 Additional Page(s) Complaint Form, #2 Additional Page(s) IFP Form) (bdb)
|
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:4. Thu Dec 22 16:49:08 CST 2022 (crt) |
| ***Clerk's Notice of delivery: (see NEF for details) Docket No:2,3. Wed Dec 21 15:06:47 CST 2022 (crt) |
| Filing 3 Notice and Instruction to Pro Se Party. (sre) |
| Filing 2 New Case Notes: A filing fee has not been paid. No prior sanctions found. (For court use only - links to the #national and #circuit indexes.) File to: appropriate staff attorney. Pursuant to Misc. Order 6, Plaintiff is provided the Notice of Right to Consent to Proceed Before A U.S. Magistrate Judge. Clerk to provide copy to plaintiff if not received electronically. Attorneys are further reminded that, if necessary, they must comply with Local Rule 83.10(a) within 14 days or risk the possible dismissal of this case without prejudice or without further notice. (sre) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Brad Shepard, David Shepard, Mike Shepard, Bob Thrasher, Mike Webster, James Young filed by Secial Heath. Unless exempted, attorneys who are not admitted to practice in the Northern District of Texas must seek admission promptly. Forms, instructions, and exemption information may be found at www.txnd.uscourts.gov, or by clicking here: # Attorney Information - Bar Membership. If admission requirements are not satisfied within 21 days, the clerk will notify the presiding judge. (sre) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
