Shirrell v. Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation
| Meredith Shirrell |
| Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation |
| 4:2023cv00914 |
| March 11, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Labor: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Meredith Shirrell, filed.(Slobin, Michael) |
Filing 11
ORDER denying #3 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
| Filing 10 REPLY in Support of #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation. (Swink, Ryan) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint. Replies due by 4/21/2023.(Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
| Filing 8 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Reply Memorandum by Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Swink, Ryan) |
| Filing 7 RESPONSE in Opposition to #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Meredith Shirrell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Slobin, Michael) |
| Filing 6 Docketed in Error - RESPONSE in Opposition to #3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, filed by Meredith Shirrell. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Slobin, Michael) Modified on 4/10/2023 (hlerma, 4). |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Meredith Shirrell, filed.(Slobin, Michael) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation, filed.(Swink, Ryan) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Swink, Ryan) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/18/2023 at 10:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrez, 4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 127th Harris County, Texas, case number 2023-09040 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29586228) filed by Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Swink, Ryan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Shirrell v. Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Meredith Shirrell | |
| Represented By: | Michael Todd Slobin |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Cholangiocarcinoma Foundation | |
| Represented By: | Ryan Joseph Swink |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
