Authentixx LLC v. Lone Star Bank
| Authentixx LLC |
| Lone Star Bank |
| 4:2023cv01275 |
| April 5, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #9 Motion for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Answer due 6/12/2023 for Lone Star Bank). (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 9 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Lone Star Bank, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Mazingo, Jason) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Authentixx LLC, filed.(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Lone Star Bank. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(hlerma, 4) |
| Filing 6 US Patent and Trademark Office Notified. AO 120, filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/16/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(AkeitaMichael, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Lone Star Bank, filed.(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Authentixx LLC, filed.(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Isaac Rabicoff on behalf of Authentixx LLC, filed. (Rabicoff, Isaac) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Lone Star Bank (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29706740) filed by Authentixx LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Rabicoff, Isaac) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Authentixx LLC v. Lone Star Bank | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Authentixx LLC | |
| Represented By: | Isaac Philip Rabicoff |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lone Star Bank | |
| Represented By: | Jason Dwain Mazingo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
