Smith v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
| Elizabeth Smith |
| Scottsdale Indemnity Company and Scottsdale Insurance Company |
| 4:2023cv01404 |
| April 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Insurance |
| 12 U.S.C. ยง 635 Breach of Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 14 RESPONSE to #11 MOTION to Remand filed by Scottsdale Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kemp, Patrick) |
| Filing 13 ANSWER to #10 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Scottsdale Insurance Company, filed.(Kemp, Patrick) |
| Filing 12 MOTION to Strike #10 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Scottsdale Insurance Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kemp, Patrick) |
| Filing 11 MOTION to Remand by Elizabeth Smith, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/5/2023. (Dick, Eric) |
| Filing 10 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Elizabeth Smith filed by Elizabeth Smith.(Dick, Eric) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Elizabeth Smith, filed.(Dick, Eric) |
Filing 8
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for First-Party Insurance Property Damage Cases Arising from Disasters.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #5 Motion to Substitute Scottsdale Insurance Company as Defendant and to Amend Case Caption. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Agreed MOTION to Substitute Party Scottsdale Insurance Company in place of Scottsdale Indemnity Company by Scottsdale Indemnity Company, filed. Motion Docket Date 5/9/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Kemp, Patrick) |
| Filing 4 SUPPLEMENT to #1 Notice of Removal, by Scottsdale Indemnity Company, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A)(Kemp, Patrick) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/16/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrez, 4)
|
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Scottsdale Indemnity Company, filed.(Wall, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from County Civil Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas, case number 1199771 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29754009) filed by Scottsdale Indemnity Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 List of Counsel, #7 Index of Matters, #8 Civil Cover Sheet)(Kemp, Patrick) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
