Hogue v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
| Stephen M. Hogue |
| Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. |
| 4:2023cv01520 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 Plaintiff's Reply Opposing Defendant Wells Fargo's Motion to Dismiss #3 MOTION to Dismiss , filed by Stephen M. Hogue. (fcarbia, 2) |
Filing 10
ORDER OF DISMISSAL entered: This case is dismissed for want of prosecution. Case terminated on 7/13/23. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER entered: The court grants the motion to dismiss. The court finds that Hogue's failure to respond to the motion to dismiss or to Wells Fargo's communications indicates that this action should be dismissed for want of prosecution. An order of dismissal will be separately entered.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Proof of Service re: #3 MOTION to Dismiss by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Durell, Daniel) |
| Filing 7 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed.(Durell, Daniel) |
| Filing 6 PROPOSED ORDER - Scheduling and Docket Control Order, filed.(Durell, Daniel) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Residential Mortgage Cases.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 6/14/2023 at 02:40 PM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. A Zoom link will be provided. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Supplement) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed. Motion Docket Date 5/22/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Durell, Daniel) |
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., filed.(Durell, Daniel) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 164th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, case number 2023-17794 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29805863) filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E)(Durell, Daniel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Hogue v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Stephen M. Hogue | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. | |
| Represented By: | Daniel Glenn Durell |
| Represented By: | Robert T Mowrey |
| Represented By: | Benjamin David Lee Foster |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
