Brooks v. Culver et al
| Roderick A. Brooks |
| Daniel Culver, Major Garrett Simmons, Donna Black, Linda Tolar and Asst Warden Patrick Coleman |
| 4:2023cv01887 |
| May 22, 2023 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER and Notice to the Plaintiff denying #5 Motion to Appoint.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(GabrielleLyons, 4)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Change of Address by Roderick A. Brooks, filed. (DarleneHansen, 4) |
| Filing 5 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel and for Speedy Trial by Roderick A. Brooks, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/17/2023. (ghassan, 4) |
| PLRA Filing fee: $402.00, receipt number 400000199, filed. (JimSuchma, 4) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Change of Address by Roderick A. Brooks, filed. (DarleneHansen, 4) |
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Roderick A. Brooks. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 6/29/2023, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (BeverlyGoolsby, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Roderick A. Brooks.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.