Farzaliyev v. USCIS et al
| Asiman Mazahir Farzaliyev |
| USCIS, Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas, UR M. JADDOU and USCIS Houston Asylum Office |
| 4:2023cv01907 |
| May 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 702 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Enes Hajdarpasic to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(JoanDavenport, 4)
|
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Asiman Mazahir Farzaliyev, filed.(Green, Sheridan) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Enes Hajdarpasic to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Asiman Mazahir Farzaliyev, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/20/2023. (Green, Sheridan) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(HortenciaLerma, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Supplement additional summons, #2 Supplement additional summons, #3 Supplement additional summons)(Green, Sheridan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29965524) filed by Asiman Mazahir Farzaliyev.(Green, Sheridan) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
